|
|
Post by phillwhitewasmad on Dec 29, 2012 18:51:57 GMT -5
Rob read in the star we have sold Richie to lakeside is the short term gain of a transfer fee a better statergy than loan deals in the long term. Also how many club assets do we have at the moment who are bringing in revenue to the club whilst riding for others or does this not happen unless we wanted to use them in our team for the year.  |
|
|
|
Post by Richard on Jan 24, 2013 18:49:01 GMT -5
Hi pwwm,
Sorry for the delay in replying but to answer your first question I think in general receiving transfer fees are better. The capital can be reinvested and there is no guarantees of how many seasons a loan fee will come in.
That said many clubs prefer to loan riders so a transfer isn't an option. With regards to loan fees there is a set cost structure and all riders loaned out to other clubs are eligible for a loan fee to be charged.
With regards to our assets out on loan I don't have a definite list so I'll not list the riders because of the risk of offending one of them by forgetting them. However, if you want to list some riders names I will do my best to let you know whether they are our asset or not.
Cheers,
Richard
|
|
